But beyond these immediate factors, the two rebel groups had greater, ideologically driven differences fueled by mutual distrust that put them at fatal odds. Why wasn't al-Jabha a-Shamiya able to prevent Harakat Hazm from killing the Nusra emirs, despite the fact that it accepted the responsibility for that in an announcement? As for their treatment of people living under their control, it differs from place to place for both brigades. Nusra spoils from the Fauj 46 battle. The law is on our side … but politics is It's true, we weren't able to prevent Hazm from killing those Nusra emirs, and we weren't able to present those who killed them to the sharia court. What do residents think of the fighting that occurred between the two groups in the Western Aleppo countryside?
Uploader: | Aragal |
Date Added: | 6 May 2005 |
File Size: | 31.96 Mb |
Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
Downloads: | 90750 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
I don't think that Hazm will respond at the current time, especially after it dissolved itself and joined al-Jabha a-Shamiya and other battalions.
Mp3 تحميل basbous rap أغنية تحميل - موسيقى
But I don't accuse a-Nusra of arresting Hazm fighters unjustly, or vice-versa—both of them acted badly towards jahba other. Al-Jabha a-Shamiya, which represents the arbitrator in the conflict between both sides—what is their opinion of Nusra and Hazm in terms of their regime-fighting capacity, and how they treat people in areas under their control? Hazm answered Nusra by kidnapping some of their members in order to negotiate a mutual exchange.
What do residents think of the fighting that occurred between the two groups in the Western Aleppo countryside? After trading mutual accusations of sabotaging rebel operations and kidnapping each other's fighters, Jabhat a-Nusra and Harakat Hazm went to war last week in the western Aleppo countryside.
Both sides accused the other of kidnapping mujahideen, and in reality both jabhs it. Memories of displacement in I Why did Nusra assault on Fauj 46, belonging to Harakat Hazm, and its killing of more than 50 fighters?
Lebanese Rap News ()
Nusra began the kidnapping operations, accusing fighters from Hazm of aiding the Syrian Revolutionaries' Front. I don't think Hazm will undertake a counterattack against Nusra because of their major losses in Fauj 46, because this loss broke Hazm's back. Just as Hazm believed that Nusra considered them kuffar and apostates and that they would one day go to war. The last event to occur was Hazm arresting a number of Nusra's leaders.
The accusations of mutual kidnappings that precipitated the conflict are true, Monzer Alsallala member of al-Jabha a-Shamiya, the mediator between the two factions, tells Syria Direct's Muatasem Jamal. In general, the reasons that pushed some factions in Hazm to separate from the group and join other brigades, not just al-Jabha a-Shamia but also FSA brigades, like Kataib Ibn Taimia, was that these groups were neutral, and saw that the mistake was not theirs, just as they wanted to keep fighting against the regime and guarantee their safety with Jabhat a-Nusra.
As you know, Hazm held Nusra prisoners, and vice-versa, but Nusra was told by al-Jabha a-Shamiya that four of its prisoners, including Abu Aisa a-Tabqa, an emir, were killed in Hazm custody.
vilreremi.tk
We couldn't do that because we didn't know with certainty that they would kill them, or that they had them in custody, especially considering Hazm never said that officially. We can't determine the real reasons behind the attack, but we can determine the professed reasons.
Among other operations, Nusra took out rival Harakat Hazm's headquarters of Fauj 46 last Friday, leading Hazm to officially announce its dissolution March 1. What were the real reasons that pushed some factions of Hazm, after Nusra attacked, to split off from the group and join up with other brigades?
And why wasn't it able to present those who had killed the emirs to a sharia court? Director of the Syrian Network for Human Rights: As for the rest of the battalions, we asked them to intervene but they only sent messages to both sides pleading with them not to fight, and they excused their absence by saying they were busy fighting on fronts against the regime.
I don't know if Nusra is right or wrong when they talk about Hazm that way.
We intervened to stop the fighting between the two sides, but the intervention was late and we arrived at the javha of the battle late, because we did not expect the fighting to happen that quickly.
Idlib rapper protests all parties.
BE2E TAYER MILED BASBOUS RAP LEBANON NEW SONG 2019 FT JABHA ميلاد بصبوص راب
Gap true, we weren't able to prevent Hazm from killing those Nusra emirs, and we weren't able to present those who killed them to the sharia court. It depends on the fighters and leaders located in those areas. But beyond these immediate factors, the two rebel groups had greater, ideologically driven differences fueled by mutual distrust that put them at fatal odds.
When we asked Hazm about the news, they said that those Nusra members were not prisoners in their captivity and that they did not kill them, and further knew nothing about them.
So in short, we don't know the real reasons. Both Jabhat a-Nusra and Harakat Hazm are accusing rao other of disrupting fronts against the regime in the western Aleppo countryside and arresting and kidnapping fighters. In his rap vide Since the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War in the spring ofhumanitarian monitoring and docum Do you think that Hazm will undertake a counterattack against Nusra or take revenge for its fighters who were killed?
No comments:
Post a Comment